The discussions surrounding former Inspector General of Police Benazir Ahmed's alleged illegal assets has gained momentum with two court rulings mandating the seizure of his properties over alleged corruption. As speculations reverberate throughout the country, this revelation has once again raised doubts about the efficacy of the state apparatus.
Given his extensive involvement in various state affairs during his tenures as head of Bangladesh Police, chief of the Rapid Action Battalion, and Commissioner of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police, it was inconceivable that a situation would arise where the assets of such a prominent police figure would come under legal scrutiny.
An event unveiling a book authored by the former IGP towards the end of his tenure can better explain the situation. The book launch, held at the Krishibid Institution's auditorium in Dhaka, was graced by the presence of Home Minister Azaduzzaman Khan Kamal, then Agriculture Minister Abdur Razzaque, and other dignitaries.
During the event, speakers, including the ministers, heaped praise upon Benazir Ahmed for his talents, integrity, and professionalism, ostensibly presenting him as the epitome of a qualified and deserving police chief.
In his lengthy expression of gratitude, Benazir Ahmed tried to show how honest, patriot and loyal to the government he is.
However, such effusive accolades, juxtaposed with present circumstances, raise questions about whether the state was oblivious to Benazir's ascent to his current position. Particularly when serious allegations are leveled against an official in the law enforcement agency who has been honored with numerous state-level awards, including the President's Medal, Prime Minister's Medal, Police Medal, and Integrity Medal in recognition of his professionalism, the underlying weaknesses of the state become glaringly apparent.
If the total value of Benazir's assets is averaged out, his daily income is no less astounding than possessing Aladdin's lamp.
As police chief, Benazir was often seen attending various events and sparking controversy with his political speeches. Upon his retirement, rumors circulated that he would soon receive a 'prize posting' in an important position. Many IGPs were appointed as ambassadors, high commissioners, or representatives of international organizations after their retirement. However, opinions vary on why an officer as controversial and politically ambitious as Benazir Ahmed did not receive such an opportunity. It is said that officers within the police force who had a hostile relationship with him do not want him to regain influence.
If the question is raised about whether Benazir Ahmed is an isolated case in our country, many would argue that there are numerous such figures in Bangladesh. They come under scrutiny only when they make headlines. Considering the socio-economic inequality in the country, where most of the wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few, it is not unreasonable to say that individuals like 'Benazir' contribute to the public's suffering. Sociologists and analysts attribute the rise of these powerful individuals to the widespread poverty and helplessness observed among the middle and lower-middle classes, as well as marginalized groups in society.
Throughout the history of independent Bangladesh, we have seen civil servants thrive as if they possessed Aladdin's lamp during various administrations. However, those 'Benazirs' who rise under the protection of the so-called powerful often remain hidden. When government employees, funded by the people's taxes, exploit the populace and become major landowners, assuming the role of feudal landlords, the notion that 'the people are the source of all power' loses its meaning.
The apparent truth in Benazir's case echoes an old adage. The significance of accountability for the administration and policymakers within a democratic governance structure is often neglected by stakeholders. Despite repeated calls for transparency, such as presenting "wealth statements" of public representatives and government employees, the clamor dies down after a few days. Issues of corruption and good governance resemble a game of cat and mouse. This longstanding practice has now become widespread, fostering a corrupt mentality through a kind of social transformation. Consequently, individuals who accumulate vast wealth through unscrupulous means often enjoy impunity.
Meanwhile, the recent resurgence of activity by the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) is noteworthy. The ACC had remained inactive regarding Benazir Ahmed for a long time, not taking any action or making any statements. However, if the court's order to seize Benazir Ahmed's substantial wealth sets a precedent and this wealth is transferred to the state, it could pave the way for similar actions against many others. The general public is now waiting to see how long this 'revolutionary' trend will last and whether it can be sustained.