The morning light of Sravan gave no hint of the bloodshed that would ensue on Sunday, August 4, 2024. A nationwide non-cooperation program was launched under the 'anti-discrimination student movement' banner, demanding the government's resignation. Historically, non-cooperation is a peaceful form of protest, but Sunday’s events bore little resemblance to the peaceful non-cooperation movements of the past.
Instead, the day was marked by extreme chaos and violence across various districts and upazilas. By day’s end, 26 people had died, including 13 policemen from Enayetpur police station in Sirajganj, bringing the total number of fatalities to nearly 100. Hundreds more were injured in clashes nationwide.
Clearly, this was not a peaceful non-cooperation movement but a day of violent terror. In response, the Ministry of Public Administration declared a general holiday for the next three days and imposed an indefinite curfew.
Despite the violence, protesters proceeded with their planned 'March to Dhaka' on Monday. Government officials and the ruling party have condemned the participation of students, claiming the movement has been overtaken by terrorists and militants. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has instructed authorities to suppress the vandalism, and the DMP Commissioner warned of legal action against those violating the curfew.
This raises the question: where is the non-cooperation aspect in this ongoing movement?
Historically, the non-cooperation movement before the Great War of Independence was non-violent. Even during the war of freedom, freedom fighters did not resort to arson but instead obstructed the Pakistani forces' operations. In contrast, recent protests have involved burning buildings and vandalizing vehicles, like the attack on Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University on Sunday.
Reflecting on the historic 'Chauri-Chaura' incident in British-ruled India might shed light on the current situation. In February 1922, Mahatma Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement faced a violent turn in Chauri-Chaura after police repression led to the death of protesters and the burning of a police station. Gandhi withdrew the movement in response to this violence, underscoring the principle that democratic movements must remain peaceful to be effective.
The current 'anti-discrimination student movement' began as a peaceful quota reform protest but has escalated into violence, leading to significant loss of life and destruction. The transformation from a reform movement to one aimed at overthrowing the government has raised concerns about its true leadership and objectives.
On observing the events and discussing with experts, it becomes clear that simply resigning Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina may not resolve the crisis. The protesters’ demands are unclear and do not address broader issues like the cost of living. Furthermore, allegations of international involvement and conspiracies, including claims of assistance from the Pakistani Embassy, add to the complexity of the situation.
The ongoing unrest exacerbates Bangladesh's socio-economic crisis, potentially impacting foreign investment, trade, and job creation. It is crucial for all parties to recognize the broader implications of the unrest and work towards restoring stability. Unity and awareness among the people, coupled with a broader political perspective, are essential to navigating these challenges and safeguarding the nation's interests.
Edited by Mahmood Menon, Editor-at-Large, Barta24.com