Supreme Court of India delivers judgment of Babri Masjid case



Staff Correspondent, Barta24.com, Dhaka
photo: collected

photo: collected

  • Font increase
  • Font Decrease

 

The 16th century Babri Masjid was demolished on December 6 of 1992. The case of Babri Masjid which has been running for last 27 years came to a halt through legal battle when the top court of India delivered its verdict on Saturday [Nov. 9] at Bangladesh time 11 a.m. The 2.77 acres of disputed land in Ayodhya has gone entirely to the Hindus, and Muslims will have to be given an alternative piece of 5 acres in Ayodhya to build a mosque, the Supreme Court has concluded in a unanimous judgment.

The "malikana haq" or the ownership right of the disputed land has gone to the Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas.

The court has said the central government should within three months formulate a scheme to set up a trust for possession of the inner and outer courtyards of the disputed site. Till such a trust is formed, the government will hold the land, the Supreme Court has said.

The trust will have, among others, the Nirmohi Akhara, whose claim to ownership of the land was dismissed today.

At the heart of the case was a property dispute dealing with the 2.77 acres. The Supreme Court had to decide who owned this land. But this piece of real estate has become the most divisive political weapon in modern India.

In 1992, a Hindu mob gathered in Ayodhya, and in the presence of BJP and other Hindutva leaders it demolished much of the Babri Masjid that was built in the 16th century and named after Babur, the first Mughal ruler.

The demolition triggered riots across the country that took 2,000 lives, mostly of Muslims. On March 12, 1993, in a devastating retaliation to the demolition, an organized crime syndicate led by Tiger Memon triggered 12 coordinated blasts in Bombay that killed 250 people.

In 2010, an Allahabad High Court judgment divided the 2.77 acres into three equal parts. Two portions went to Hindu parties -- the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla Virajmaan -- and one portion to the Uttar Pradesh Central Sunni Wakf Board. The two Hindu parties and the Muslim side contested this judgment and moved the country’s top court.

The Supreme Court heard the matter for 40 days and concluded the hearing on October 16, 2019. It ended on an ominous note when a map on the purported birthplace of Lord Ram was torn up in court. That day, a rumor raged outside the courtroom that the Sunni Wakf Board had withdrawn its claim to the land.

The apex court bench was led by the soon-to-retire Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi. The other judges were Justices S.A. Bobde, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S.A. Nazeer.

During the hearings, Rajiv Dhavan, the lawyer for the Muslim parties, told the bench he had noticed that the judges' "questions have been directed at me", not the Hindu parties.

On the other side, C.S. Vaidynathan, the lawyer for Ram Lalla – the deity of the child Lord Ram – told the court that it was the "belief of Hindus” that Lord Ram's birthplace is Ayodhya and “the court should not go beyond to see how rational (it is)".

The case was unusual in the way that Lord Ram and the Ram Janmabhoomi were also parties in it.

Before the hearings, the top court also tried the mediation route. It set up a panel of three – retired judge Ibrahim Kalifullah, art of living guru Ravi Shankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu. The committee, set up in March, failed to find a solution, and the matter returned to the court.

The BJP, the RSS and its affiliate organizations have always wanted a temple of Lord Ram to be built where the mosque once stood. “Mandir yahin banayenge (we will make the temple right here)” became an oft-heard slogan at political meetings under Narendra Modi’s rule.

On the eve of the judgment, though, Prime Minister Modi appealed for calm. “The Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya would not be a matter of victory or loss. I appeal to countrymen that it should be our priority to strengthen our tradition of maintaining peace and harmony after Ayodhya verdict,” he tweeted on Thursday[Nov.7] night, while several states announced police deployments to tackle any possible violence.

Section 144 was enforced in Ayodhya on October 12 and will be in force till December 10.

The Uttar Pradesh government ordered all educational and training institutes to stay shut till Monday after the court website informed around 9 pm on Friday that the verdict would be given at 10.30 am on Saturday, when courts normally don’t function.

Earlier about 500 suspected people were also arrested as preventive measures to check any outbreak of possible deterioration of law and order situation.

   

'Developing countries like Bangladesh are the first victims of the Middle East crisis'



Ashraful Islam, Planning Editor, Barta24.com, Dhaka
Pic: Barta24.com

Pic: Barta24.com

  • Font increase
  • Font Decrease

Israel-Iran conflict has again become a great threat to the stability of the entire Middle East without the end of Israeli brutality in Palestine along the path of Israel-Hamas conflict. International relations expert Professor of International Relations department of Jahangirnagar University Dr. Shahab Enam Khan thinks so. He said, developing countries like Bangladesh will be the first victims of instability in the Middle East. Referring to this ongoing crisis as 'long-term', Bangladesh should not only rely on garments and remittances to deal with the possible situation, but should prepare international trade diplomacy. The Professor said these things in an exclusive interview given to Barta24.com. Planning Editor Ashraful Islam spoke.

Barta24.com: How to assess the recent tense situation in the Middle East? What kind of global challenges is this creating, especially for developing countries like ours?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: The situation in the Middle East is completely unpredictable and this unpredictability will continue for a long time. This unpredictability is not just like Israel or Iran jumping for a few days and then stopping again. This unpredictability will continue for a long time and will be at the center of Israel. The relationship between the Arab and Western world revolves around Israel. So here is the volatility centered on Israel. And the crux of it is that the Western world handles it. To be clear, the Arab world has no role here except to wage war of words. There is another point - in view of these events, there is now a big polarization between Russia-China-Turkey-Iran, centered on them. On the other hand, there has been a polarization in the Western world around Israel. This polarization will have a huge impact on the global economy. They would like the West to not be able to do this, which would put a huge strain on the global economy and monetary system. The first victims will be the developing countries.

Barta24.com: Does that mean it is becoming clear that the Western monopoly on the world order has collapsed?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: Absolutely. That is why polarization has been created in the world. The Western world has a monopoly on Israel but not Iran. But what will happen to Israel's relationship with the West, how they handle this relationship will depend on how the days ahead will be. What Israel's relationship with the Arabs will be does not matter here.

Barta24.com: Can't we see some kind of contrast between the speeches and statements of the Western countries, especially the United States, and their internal stand...at least when assessing the situation?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: That's right. I will add one more thing, that is - the upcoming election in the United States is also an important issue. Because of this, the Israel-West relationship will remain unstable for a long time. It is precisely because of this that the world economy and monetary system are under great stress which will have an impact on developing countries like Bangladesh.

Barta24.com: What kind of impact do you think?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: First of all, different types of sanctions, alternative currency pressure will come. Secondly, there will be a lot of strategic diplomatic pressure at this time. We have a kind of constitutional commitment to stand by Palestine, we have been showing it. We have taken the same stand in the case of Rohingyas. Stand up for endangered humanity.

Barta24.com: What kind of precautions should we take in terms of reality?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: We need a complete rethinking of international trade. It will not be possible to depend only on garments and remittances. India has not been hit as much by the current world situation or as much as we were by the Ukraine crisis because of the diversity of the Indian economy. I think we have to work hard on four areas. First: Energy security, more precisely we have to achieve self-sufficient energy, which is directly related to national interest. It needs to be mentioned here that many people confuse the national interest of our country with personal interest. In national interest we have to ensure our energy security from indigenous sources. We will not have it with inefficient energy institutions. The entire energy system needs to be overhauled.

Second, our trade diplomacy should not only be verbalized, but trade diplomacy should be strengthened in a practical sense. Among these will be the number one priority, 'Diversity'. That is, various sectors of the economy should be strengthened.

Thirdly, existing relations with Arab countries should be deepened. Also, it is important to create strong alliances with other developing countries that will be affected by this global tension and conflict. We may not be interested in going to BRICS and try to do something ourselves, where our own interests will be prioritized where many countries like Bangladesh are worried about the existing situation. If Bangladesh can bring many economies together to create a collective voice, it will also bring effective results.

Many countries will tell us a lot, but we have to think about how effective it will be in practice. Bangladesh has been talking about trade multi-lateralization for at least a decade, but there is no action on what to export, what to have. Indigenous people are not creating any industry here, nothing much has been done with the potential jute. That means not only words, but a practical effort needs to be taken in the practical sense.

Fourth is to strengthen and expand the internal market. At the moment, the domestic market of Bangladesh is largely dependent. A Cadbury chocolate in India manufactured by themselves to British standards and offered to consumers. There is no more trouble with foreign currency. People are eager to buy old cars in Bangladesh. With such a large market, why is the indigenous car industry not happening here? If it was a country with a small population like Bhutan or the Maldives, one would think so, but that is not the case. We are very relieved to ride in an old car, because the reality is that a car is a necessity. Where economic productivity has increased, scale has increased; Human mobility will naturally increase. But here the productivity and safety of people are being minimized by importing with 200-400% tax.

There is a lot of talk about transitioning into a developing country in 2026, but what will happen to the pharmaceutical industry here? Let the government create APIs with subsidies, let them create commodities - but apart from all this, we are filled with thoughts of impossible adventures which should not be done at all.

Barta24.com: Is excessive bureaucratic reliance a barrier to discouraging possibility and diversity?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: Of course, the economy can never be bureaucratic. Here the private sector needs to be brought into more policy making. Private sector believes in profit. So they always want variety. If bureaucrats could understand export diversification, why did the jute industry fail? I think creative industries should be brought in here by reducing bureaucracy dependence by going for extensive privatization. It will help the country's economy a lot in the current global crisis.

Barta24.com: The tension on the border of Myanmar is not stopping, do you see a sustainable solution?

Dr. Shahab Enam Khan: Sustainable solution will come only when Arakan is stabilized. Bangladesh needs to play a leading role in stabilizing Arakan. It can be done in many ways - single support or contribution to infrastructure development. Steps can be taken to strengthen their civil society, political society. It will be seen that the Americans from across the Atlantic are doing it right. Bangladesh is talking about democracy and then Bangladesh can work to restore democracy there. We need to engage with the actors that are active there, not just the Arakan Army because without them the repatriation of Rohingya will not be possible. The Tatmadaw (Myanmar's government military) will not solve this. Nor will the Rohingya crisis be resolved even if the Tatmadaw takes root in Rakhine. If the Tatmadaw cannot stay, the Arakan Army comes; it will not be a solution if they are not engaged. Although Bangladesh has made a lot of progress on the Rohingya issue in the past year, nothing has happened before.

Edited by: Mahmood Menon, Editor-at-Large, Barta24.com 

;

11 more members of BGP fled from Myanmar to Bangladesh



Staff Correspondent, Barta24.com, Cox’s Bazar
Pic: Barta24.com

Pic: Barta24.com

  • Font increase
  • Font Decrease

Within 24 hours, 11 Myanmar Border Guard Police (BGP) members have again taken refuge in Bangladesh. They fled through the Teknaf border and took refuge in Bangladesh amid the ongoing conflict inside Myanmar. Currently, 285 members of the Myanmar Army and Border Guard BGB have taken refuge in Bangladesh.

On Friday (April 19), 3 BGP members took shelter again through Jimbangkhali border in Teknaf and 8 in Hatimarajhiri.

Earlier last night, 13 BGP members surrendered to the Coast Guard after crossing the Naf river in Teknaf. The Coast Guard later transferred the BGP members to the Naikshyongchari Battalion (11 BGB) of the BGB.

Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) Public Relations Officer Shariful Islam confirmed the matter.

He said that yesterday 13 and today 11 BGP members fled through the Teknaf border and took refuge in Bangladesh. So far a total of 285 people are staying in Bangladesh. All of them are in BGB custody. 

;

'285 BGP and Army personnel to be sent back on April 22'



Staff Correspondent, Barta24.com
Pic: Barta24.com

Pic: Barta24.com

  • Font increase
  • Font Decrease

285 members of the Border Guard Police (BGP) and the Army who fled Myanmar to Bangladesh to save their lives will be sent back by sea on April 22.

On Friday (April 19) afternoon, Foreign Minister Dr. Hasan Mahmud informed this.

He said, the country has assured to take back 285 members of the Myanmar border guard and Army who have taken refuge in Bangladesh. On April 22, BGP members and Army personnel who took refuge will be sent back by ship. A final discussion has been held on this matter. The ship that will come to pick them up will bring 150 Bengalis stuck in Myanmar.

At this time, the Foreign Minister also said that there was a discussion about sending our manpower to Greece. We have talked with the foreign minister of Greece about setting up an embassy in our country. Bangladesh is also in the list of embassies in 6 new countries.

Apart from this, there was an opportunity to speak about environmental pollution and protection of fish resources at a meeting in Greece. The Minister said that Bangladesh's decision to stop fishing for 65 days has been appreciated. 

;

45 Bangladeshis detained in Malaysia



Special Correspondent, Barta24.com, South-East Asia
45 Bangladeshis detained in Malaysia

45 Bangladeshis detained in Malaysia

  • Font increase
  • Font Decrease

49 foreigners, including 45 Bangladeshis, were arrested from the premises of an under-construction building in Padang Besar, Perlis province, Malaysia.

They were detained by the Immigration Department on Friday (April 19) morning on charges of illegal stay.

Perlis Immigration Director Khairul Amin Talib said the detainees were overstaying and no valid documents were found with them.

A total of 45 Bangladeshi nationals including 1 woman were arrested. Apart from this, there are 3 Indonesian and 1 Indian citizen. Their age is between 19 to 54 years.

Talib said that the operation was carried out in the area under construction of Sekolah Sukan in Bukit Chabang area of the city. Those arrested have been sent to Kuala Perlis Prison for further investigation.

A total of 101 foreigners were searched during the operation. From which 49 people have been arrested.

He said that the charges against these foreigners will be investigated under Section 6(1)(c), Section 15(1)(c) and Section 56(1)(d) of the Immigration Act 1959/63. 

;