BNP Secretary General's statement
In response to BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam's statement, the interim government's Information and Broadcasting adviser Md. Nahid Islam posted a status on his Facebook profile.
He responded in a post on his verified Facebook profile on Thursday (January 23).
In the post, he wrote that the BNP Secretary General's demand for a neutral government basically indicates the formation of another 1/11 government. Awami fascism had emerged since the 1/11 settlement.
The BNP Secretary General's statement indicates another 1/11 government ahead, the continuation of parliamentary majority and kneeling foreign policy, and the lack of justice for the disappearances, murders and July massacres.
The plan to eliminate students and the leadership of the coup has started since August 5. On August 5, when the students and the masses were fighting on the streets, and the police were firing continuously, many of our compromise-seeking national leaders were busy planning to form a new government in the cantonment, excluding the people (many even mentioned the students there).
We have been saying since August 3 that we will not accept any kind of military rule or emergency. Although we were repeatedly asked to go to the cantonment, we refused to go. Finally, through discussions and bargaining at Bangabhaban, it was decided to form an interim government headed by Dr. Yunus.
We wanted a national government consisting of anti-fascist political parties and civil society. If there was a national government, the students might not have needed to come to the government. Considering that the national government would last for a long time, the BNP did not agree to a national government.
But the need for a national government in the country was greatest after the coup. However, the BNP is talking about a national government after the upcoming elections.
The students are the only factor in this government and the existing reality that completely separates the current government from the 1/11 government. BNP discussed minus two a few days ago, but now it is proposing another 1/11 government in the name of a neutral government to smooth the way to power.
Such a plan will go against democracy and national interests and the students and the public will not accept it in any way. And I think it is a conspiracy against BNP as well.
And although this government is not a national government, all sides of the movement have a stake in the government and all sides are enjoying various benefits. Before the formation of the government, the Attorney General and the previous IG of the Police were appointed on August 6, who are basically BNP people. In this way, there are BNP-supporting people at various levels from top to bottom in the government. When talking about the neutrality of the elections, this reality must also be kept in mind.
BNP has taken a stand against all issues, including the change of the president, reforms, the new constitution, and the July announcement. However, none of these were demands of the students' party. But the students have repeatedly backed down from their position to maintain the stability of the country, the larger interests, and national unity.
But this does not mean that if there is a plan that is anti-democratic and against the desire for a coup, we will make a single concession.
Unity has been possible between the main parties in India on the Awami League, but in Bangladesh we have not been able to achieve unity on the Awami League despite so many killings and crimes. Alas, will we build a state with this 'national unity'!
It is easy to weaken Bangladesh because Bangladesh can be easily divided. The big people of this country are ready to be sold at a low price.
I do not think the entire BNP takes this position. Rather, a large section of BNP activists and supporters want the realization of the desire for a coup. I would like to call on the patriotic and selfless leadership of BNP to choose the path of greater unity and solidarity with the student masses instead of going against the student masses' uprising.